Request Chloë Moretz ?

CoolCat13

Active Member
What if I told you it's not artistic erotica if you're jerking off to it.
Technically, if one jerks off to something, it does not, by definition, make it that which they jerked off to pornographic, in fact, it's the other way around: it means it's on them -- or, I guess, you, since you put it in you own words, as yourself [in the first person] -- and that it's what turns you on, that puts into question, your perversion towards sexualizing whatever it is you found to jerk-off to. If you want further info. either talk to a shrink or read Freud.
For example: If you jerk-off to, say, violence, then you're probably a sadist, or into S&M, but it doesn't mean the violent act (like torcher, murder, etc.) is, itself, pornographic; if you jerkoff to, perhaps, something sacred, like a Bible or the Holy Virgin, it means you're probably a satanic SOB with a touch of S&M, but it doesn't mean the Good Book or the Virgin Mary are pornographic; if you jerkoff to trees, then you're probably a denderpheliac, but it doesn't mean trees are pornographic; if you jerkoff to a corpse, then you're probably a necropheliac, but it doesn't mean dead people are pornographic; if you jerkoff to the same gender as yourself (like, another dude standing fully clothed in the middle of the street), then you're probably a homosexual, but that doesn't mean that other person is gay or pornographic; if you're jerking off to a work of art [or erotica], it does not mean it's pornographic; and so on & so forth.
So, whatever you jerkoff to, does not mean that whatever you jerk off to is porn, it just mean's you found something to make you happy...or pass the time... or probably both; hell, isn't that why we're all here @ this site, anyways? Whether it's art, or porn, or whatever, it's whatever makes you happy.
 
Last edited:

CoolCat13

Active Member
The Venus De Milo is amputee porn. Anyone had a go on her.
Actually, I read about some poor greek dude, who was actually recorded -- literally, like into the historical record -- that actually did! No Bullshit!

Venus was the Greek Goddess of Love -- or some shit -- and her statue stood in a temple -- for many centuries -- and she had a "very, very devoted follower, who would stay giving "offerings" to her right butt cheek ever night, and every morning, the poor priestesses would have to clean it up, but over time, a white "stain" formed over her right cheek of her marble ass. Seriously, I couldn't make this kind of shit up! LOL!
 

SteelBadger

Active Member
I once jerked off to a sculpture of Michelangelo... so I just turned his art to XXX material? good to know I can do that
a picture of her tits that she took in privacy is not art. its Her Private material. what we're doing is already messed up. but by why get a kid involved.
 

SteelBadger

Active Member
Technically, if one jerks off to something, it does not, by definition, make it that which they jerked off to pornographic, in fact, it's the other way around: it means it's on them -- or, I guess, you, since you put it in you own words, as yourself [in the first person] -- and that it's what turns you on, that puts into question, your perversion towards sexualizing whatever it is you found to jerk-off to. If you want further info. either talk to a shrink or read Freud.
For example: If you jerk-off to, say, violence, then you're probably a sadist, or into S&M, but it doesn't mean the violent act (like torcher, murder, etc.) is, itself, pornographic; if you jerkoff to, perhaps, something sacred, like a Bible or the Holy Virgin, it means you're probably a satanic SOB with a touch of S&M, but it doesn't mean the Good Book or the Virgin Mary are pornographic; if you jerkoff to trees, then you're probably a denderpheliac, but it doesn't mean trees are pornographic; if you jerkoff to a corpse, then you're probably a necropheliac, but it doesn't mean dead people are pornographic; if you jerkoff to the same gender as yourself (like, another dude standing fully clothed in the middle of the street), then you're probably a homosexual, but that doesn't mean that other person is gay or pornographic; if you're jerking off to a work of art [or erotica], it does not mean it's pornographic; and so on & so forth.
So, whatever you jerkoff to, does not mean that whatever you jerk off to is porn, it just mean's you found something to make you happy...or pass the time... or probably both; hell, isn't that why we're all here @ this site, anyways? Whether it's art, or porn, or whatever, it's whatever makes you happy.
what we're doing is already messed up. but you're getting a kid involved. a picture of her tits from her cellphone is not art. its her private material. and the jerk off part is in the name of the website. The Fappening.
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
a picture of her tits that she took in privacy is not art. its Her Private material. what we're doing is already messed up. but by why get a kid involved.
I honestly don't know what picture you're referring too, 'cause all of the pics I've seen in this Post are strictly non-nude. However, assuming whatever you are referring to is correct, then what you are referring to -- both morally & legally -- is an invasion of one's privacy, and if that were true, if she -- or in her case, since she's not of legal age of consent to such private material, whether she took a photo of herself or not, then her parents or legal guardian(s) -- has a problem with that, then they can seek legal counsel --- like anyone (example: JLaw & Kate Upton did with their lawyers)--- to bring those said image(s) from being shown, viewed, seen, &/or displayed online. In short: If they have a problem with any of it, then they'll take (legal) action. If not, then either they don't care, or the pics aren't real/legit. So if they don't have a problem, then why should you?

FYI: Even if it's real, whatever picture you're referring to, these sort of online nudes of underage celebs is nothing new, example: Natalie Portman, at the age of 12, went sunbathing nude on some nude European beach, and candid photos of her underage naked body not only surfaced online, but were actually splashed onto millions of newspapers and magazines around the world, and -- while she wasn't too happy about it -- nobody really gave a shit, morally or legally, and she still went on to become a great, talented, world-famous actress.
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
what we're doing is already messed up. but you're getting a kid involved. a picture of her tits from her cellphone is not art. its her private material. and the jerk off part is in the name of the website. The Fappening.
Seriously, what fucking nudie pic are you whining about?!??! Where is it on this post?!?! THERE ARE NOT ANY NAKED SELFIES OF HER IN THIS POST, SO STOP YOU'RE BITCHING!
 
C

Castro29

Guest
Hick it's a great movie. I liked a lot.
I wanna see If I Stay, looks good.
And Clouds of Sils Maria, with my favorite actress Kristen Stewart and Chloe Grace Moretz. Awsome!
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
I definitely would like to see anything you have of this beautiful human canvas. To the best of my knowledge, she has not had her privacy invaded and to the best of my knowledge, she has not filed any complaint or report if there is any images or videos out there... if it isn't pornography and if she isn't complaining, it is open season and fair game as far as I'm concerned. Please share!!!
Amen Brother! Ditto! Damn Right! Plz Share!
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
In my eyes, one beautiful glimpse of Chloe is worth a thousand filthy Mileys. I have an unedited outake from the very first episode of Hannah Montana... full upskirt, no panties... oh its real, its damn real! Give me 3 CGM here and I will post the Mileys here.
Who is 3 CGM?
 
X

Xeenopeen91

Guest
no but you're looking for them you pederast
Every reporter that reported on the fappening for the news had to look at the pics to confirm they were a real source. Therefore everyone of them saw day 1 mckayla m pics that are apparently underage. (and if they are , she'll face punishment for making them, not us for looking.) so THEREFORE...all of your favorite news stations and website writers, ect are all pedos too.
 
X

Xeenopeen91

Guest
no but you're looking for them you pederast
The reporters were even taking part in threads in 4chan stating their names and contact info. SO THEREFORE they were an accessory to the "crime" lol
Everyone finds someone under the age of 18 attractive sooner or later.
 

larry

Member
well here is my point who cares if it is her or not and as for the age thing her are a few examples of other celebs that showed nude flesh befor they were 18

thora birch - American Beauty - age 17
Brooke Shields - Pretty Baby (1978) - age 12
Keira Knightley - The Hole (2001) - age 16
vanessa hudgens first nude leaks she was 16yr old
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
Hmmm,

reading this now since it was created and I have to tell it's a little bit funny talking about ethnic behave. We all "stalk" privat pictures and vids of people we dont realy know and also they got stolen.

If you go to a nudist beach you will see more than this pics.
I understand also that in the US, where the age of beeing an adult is 21 but in other countrys it is 18 and you can be in an relationship with a 16 year old. "Romeo and Julia".

But what I don't understand is that people which have Problems with this thread are always responding and feed the Troll.

There is a admin who have to decide if legit or not or send a Report or something else.

Thats my point.
Your point is an Interesting one, however, you're somewhat incorrect: In the USA, the legal age of consent is 18 in all forms: such as being given the automatic Selective Service Enrollment (which is just a fancy bunch of freedom-sounding words for national conscription, into the armed services, should a war ever arise -- not the BS ones like in Iraq 2.0 -- but for War that U.S. Congress approves....like we really have any choice in the matter....); the right to vote; the right to own property, Enfranchised To Pay Taxes (......like we have a choice.....), To "Participate" as a Jury Member in a legal case (....like we have a choice....), & (My personal Favorite...It's also why we are all here, too...) the right to model/perform/etc. nude &/or participate in sexually explicit material (like porn, erotica, and all the good stuff). In short: At 18 (according to the Federal Government), in the USA, You are an adult, & no longer a child (at least, legally), for all save one main exception: BOOZ! Liquire! The Nectar of the Gods! It's technically a state thing, not a federal/national one, but (in all 50 States of the USA), you must be 21 to drink, sell, &/or distribute alcohol of any kind (except for non-consumables, like rubbing alcohol -- Iodine, Hydrogen Peroxide, etc. -- or for religious purposes, like for drinking wine at the Holy Communion for Catholics).

Also, in a couple of states, mostly in the US Midwest, I think, it's technically 21 -- like you mentioned -- & not 18....I think maybe for Utah or something....but again, according to that State, not the US Gov't.

Weird huh? Seriously, if you think us Yanks are odd/strange when it comes to underage nudity -- compared to Europe and most of the world -- we're even crazier when it comes to drinking alcohol or smoking! LOL

FYI: I'm not a drinker, or a smoker, but I likes my (legal) nudity & porn!
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
well here is my point who cares if it is her or not and as for the age thing her are a few examples of other celebs that showed nude flesh befor they were 18

thora birch - American Beauty - age 17
Brooke Shields - Pretty Baby (1978) - age 12
Keira Knightley - The Hole (2001) - age 16
vanessa hudgens first nude leaks she was 16yr old
Don't forget about Natalie Portman! I just recently mentioned her, earlier!
 
X

Xeenopeen91

Guest
Your point is an Interesting one, however, you're somewhat incorrect: In the USA, the legal age of consent is 18 in all forms: such as being given the automatic Selective Service Enrollment (which is just a fancy bunch of freedom-sounding words for national conscription, into the armed services, should a war ever arise -- not the BS ones like in Iraq 2.0 -- but for War that U.S. Congress approves....like we really have any choice in the matter....); the right to vote; the right to own property, Enfranchised To Pay Taxes (......like we have a choice.....), To "Participate" as a Jury Member in a legal case (....like we have a choice....), & (My personal Favorite...It's also why we are all here, too...) the right to model/perform/etc. nude &/or participate in sexually explicit material (like porn, erotica, and all the good stuff). In short: At 18 (according to the Federal Government), in the USA, You are an adult, & no longer a child (at least, legally), for all save one main exception: BOOZ! Liquire! The Nectar of the Gods! It's technically a state thing, not a federal/national one, but (in all 50 States of the USA), you must be 21 to drink, sell, &/or distribute alcohol of any kind (except for non-consumables, like rubbing alcohol -- Iodine, Hydrogen Peroxide, etc. -- or for religious purposes, like for drinking wine at the Holy Communion for Catholics).

Also, in a couple of states, mostly in the US Midwest, I think, it's technically 21 -- like you mentioned -- & not 18....I think maybe for Utah or something....but again, according to that State, not the US Gov't.

Weird huh? Seriously, if you think us Yanks are odd/strange when it comes to underage nudity -- compared to Europe and most of the world -- we're even crazier when it comes to drinking alcohol or smoking! LOL

FYI: I'm not a drinker, or a smoker, but I likes my (legal) nudity & porn!
Also Arkansas and Georgia's age of consent is 16. Went to a mall in Arkansas once and everyone was 16 and married with a kid already in the stroller. Weird, but legal.
 

CoolCat13

Active Member
what age and what movie
Again, Larry: READ MY THREAD. I'm not gonna rehash that crap again, when you can just scoll up a bit & read the threads.

For the record, it technically wasn't a movie, but she was just 12 years old @ the time.
 
Top